The Hunt (Jagten)
It has been a little while since my last review. I sort of hit a lull in terms of drive unfortunately. I suppose I was waiting for a movie I really wanted to scream about. Something that would make me get off my ass and write because I wanted everyone to know how stupendously awesome this movie was. I think I found that with The Hunt. A searing, uncompromising drama about a modern day witch hunt. I try to be as non-spoilery as possible, but some events of the film are revealed during the course of the review.
Lucas (Mads Mikkelson) works at a kindergarten school in a Danish Village. He is extremely popular with the kids at the school, playful roughhousing seeming to be a favorite activity for both the kids and Lucas. Through a series of complicated, subtle events, Lucas's best friends daughter Klara (Annika Wedderkopp) conveys to another teacher that something sexually explicit happened between her and Lucas. The situation spirals steadily out of control from this moment on. The rest of the film is an examination of how these accusations slowly destroy Lucas's life, and the innate level of paranoia and distrust that lies within all human beings.
This movie is not a mystery. It is not a thriller. Lucas did not do what he is being accused of. Period. I really liked that the movie destroyed all doubt, eliminating the suspense thriller aspect that other more conventional films take. This is an analysis of what happens to a wrongfully accused man and the film thrives on this focus.
That short introduction to the story is skipping over a lot of details. And really, that is what this movie is all about. The entire situation plays out with subtlety while foreshadowing a sense of absolute dread. Each of the events leading up to the accusation and later multiple accusations do not amount to much in and of themselves, but when combined in sequence and coupled with a crowd-sense of hysteria, blow the situation completely out of proportion. I would have to write pages and pages about the nuanced looks, dialog and physical interactions to even begin to convey how this situation came about. It is this subtlety and attention to detail that makes the whole situation alarmingly believable. There is nothing here that an audience can scoff at. These are real human beings in a real situation, and real situations are sticky, dirty and complicated. Because of this unnerving sense of reality, it is heartbreaking to witness the slowly worsening situation while Lucas feebly attempts to live his life, realizing he is completely powerless to stop it.
Which brings me to the linchpin of this entire film: Mads Mikkelson. His portrayal of Lucas is nothing short of brilliant. The character is not perfect. He has a marriage that seems to be broken beyond repair, and for reasons that are not really clear it seems he is working at the school as a way to sort of get his life back on track. But that's just it, Lucas is so identifiable. Mikkelson makes it so easy for audience members to put themselves in his position. And once you do that, this movie hits you like a ton of bricks. Mikkelson's understated performance is affecting in a way I can barely describe. This role could have easily been something more melodramatic. More yelling, crying, screaming and all the rest of the direct physical manifestations of the feelings of a man that is falsely accused of such a heinous crime. Instead, Mikkelson underplays it. He underplays it to the point where the audience wants him to lose his shit. Go nuts! Yell, scream, wave your hands in the air! Instead, Mikkelson sticks to the character. Quiet, introverted, and ultimately a man who puts up with way more than he should.
That is not to say that Lucas does not get a chance to cut loose a bit. A very satisfying moment in a grocery store comes to mind. But the scene that stood out for me was toward the end of the movie. It takes place in a church, where we watch Mikkelson and his best friend, the father of Klara, exchange deep, hair-raising glances that ultimately lead to one of the most emotional and intense confrontations in the film. The shots of Mikkelson looking over his shoulder were perfectly executed. Gave me goosebumps.
I want to take a moment to rave about Mikkelson (as if I haven't already). He has proven yet again that he is one of the worlds premier actors. This along with the Hannibal TV series and A Royal Affair (Thanks +Shaguna Khazanchi!) has solidified him as top talent. I would say "get this guy more work!" but, I enjoy the films he decides to take on today. I do not want to see an over saturation of him. I would prefer a few quality roles over many average roles. His projects seem to be a nice split between big pictures like (King Arthur, Clash of Titans, Casino Royale) and smaller personal films (Valhalla Rising, The Hunt, Pusher II). Keep an eye out for him, I believe he is the next big thing.
The ending of the movie is poignant without being schlocky, and delivers the films ultimate message: Lucas will never be fully accepted. He will never escape the accusations, no matter how much proof is presented in his favor.
It is this heartbreaking fact that leads me to consider some modern day parallels. I could not help thinking following as I watched this movie:
1) Salem witch trials
2) McCarthyism
3) Michael Jackson
There is a fundamental difference between the film and say, the Salem witch trials: Witchcraft was not something to truly fear. Sexual assault is. But my argument here would be that as much of a reality child molestation is, so was witchcraft to the population at its time. Communism was the same in the time of the Senator Mccarthy. And obviously the perception of MJ changed after the accusations of molestation were made.
It is only fair to highlight one of the other large differences here: Each of the 3 cases provide above involved ulterior motives. There was personal gain to be had in all three cases. Creating mass hysteria for personal gain is not a situation that this movie examines.
Having said that, each of the three situations do share one thing in common with the film: the destructive aftermath of the given accusation even when they were not proven to be true. Reputations were sullied, lives were destroyed and the ultimate price, death, was often the result.
In some cases it was death by their own hand, other times it was capital punishment. Regardless on the physical method of their demise, it is clear that the executioner of these poor wrongfully accused souls was in fact the accuser. The one that pointed the finger and made a false accusation was the judge, jury and executioner.
Michael Jackson is sort of the amalgamation of all of these situations into a single person. Much beloved by the world until accusations arose of alleged molestation charges. He was not convicted. The rest of his life was, to put it lightly, a mess. He was never seen the same way again. The media skewered his image, and on the eve of his return to the limelight, he died.
I am not going to pretend to know all the details surrounding his death, or the details of the molestation case (or cases it would seem) that changed his life, but it is a well established fact he was not convicted. Lucas was also not convicted. The Hunt is what I would call an ideal case study in that the audience knows that Lucas did not commit the crime. I realize there are divided opinions on how people feel regarding MJ. For the sake of leveling the playing field for comparison, I am sticking to the result of the court and defaulting to the judgement of the judicial system, not opinion.
It can be argued that the stress induced by the accusations led to, or were partly responsible for, MJ's premature death. I believe that the character of Lucas has a truly difficult life ahead of him, as do the people that care about him. It is conceivable that he may also suffer a similar fate later in his life. The ending of The Hunt certainly alludes to such an outcome. Given these parameters, Lucas and MJ are very much in the same boat: Accused, acquitted, but subsequently destroyed.
As you can probably tell, The Hunt has had a lingering affect on me. Technically, the film is very well put together. Acting, writing, and cinematography are top notch. The movie not only asks the tough questions, but is not afraid to charge head on into the potential answers. It is and uncomfortable yet satisfying viewing experience that will stick with you beyond the run time of the film. Most importantly, the movie is not a product of its time. Director Thomas Vinterberg has put something together that plays to the basic human condition. It is so real you can't help but get sucked in. As a direct result, this movie will play just as effectively now as it would in 30 or 300 years. Vinterberg has achieved timelessness by playing on our innate fears and prejudices.
I really believe this is a great film. Go see it.
And check out some other films starring Madds! He is awesome!
No comments:
Post a Comment